View Full Version: Repeal "Banning the Use of Landmines"

The United Nations Old Guard > Repeal Discussion > Repeal "Banning the Use of Landmines"


Title: Repeal "Banning the Use of Landmines"


Gruenberg - March 17, 2006 12:21 AM (GMT)
I plan to submit this if the UNDS proposal passes.

QUOTE
The United Nations,

RECALLING the many resolutions in UN law forming a fundamental commitment to the protection of citizens' rights,

TAKING NOTE, especially, of Resolution #31, "Wolfish Convention on POW", Resolution #51, "Children in War", and Resolution #111, "Civilian Rights Post War",

REAFFIRMING the intent of these and other resolutions to protect both military and civilian personnel from undue abuse,

RECOGNISING that there exist many non-UN nations who may be hostile to UN member nations and to the UN, and who are not governed by the responsibilities of such resolutions,

LAMENTING that war between UN member nations and non-UN nations is inevitable, and concerned that in such cases non-UN parties will not be bound by international law on the treatment of soldiers and civilians, especially children, and on the use of torture,

ACKNOWLEDGING that the UN can do little to prevent such circumstances, and must allow its members to exercise to the fullest degree possible their ability to deter attack and invasion by non-UN nations,

UPHOLDING the sentiment of Resolution #110, "United Nations Security Act", that 'all member states have the right to construct and utilize any and all weapons that are necessary to defend their nation from attack',

OBSERVING the capacity of landmines to act as an effective deterrent to invading forces, and acknowledging the possibility that they could be used to prevent human rights abuses on the behalf of an occupying force not bound by UN law,

FURTHER NOTING that, in their capacity as 'area-denial munitions', landmines have the capability to divert hostile forces away from settled areas and the civilian populace, and thereby to actually limit civilian casualties,

COMMENDING Resolution #150, "UN Demining Survey", for tackling the unfortunate potential of landmines to pose risk to civilians after the cessation of hostilities,

RESOLVING that member nations should not be denied the possibility of defending themselves and their citizens from unregulated attack through the responsible deployment of landmines:

REPEALS Resolution #40, "Banning the Use of Landmines".

Gruenberg - March 30, 2006 11:01 AM (GMT)

The Palentine - March 31, 2006 01:09 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Gruenberg @ Mar 30 2006, 11:01 AM)
http://nationstates.net/page=UN_proposal1/match=landmines

Resubmitted.

Re-endorsed! ;)

Waterana - March 31, 2006 05:58 AM (GMT)
I am cautiously for the repeal because the other resolution has already passed, however you may want to consider taking out the "LAMENTING that war between UN member nations and non-UN nations is inevitable" part. I lost some votes when CRPW was on the floor because I had an inevitability of war line in it, and some of the real peace maker nations didn't like it. They considered it a false statement.


TBlack - March 31, 2006 09:33 AM (GMT)
Didn’t you learn anything from Princess Diana?

(will endorse once on a working computer)

Gruenberg - March 31, 2006 11:13 AM (GMT)
Waterana: I honestly hadn't considered that. It's too late to change it now - I just hope I don't cop any flak for that (to be honest, early responses aren't promising anyway - a lot of "no landmines are evil" replies). Did you have a rebuttal for that argument?

Cobdenia - March 31, 2006 01:04 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Boring Internet Games @ Mar 31 2006, 11:13 AM)
Waterana: I honestly hadn't considered that. It's too late to change it now - I just hope I don't cop any flak for that (to be honest, early responses aren't promising anyway - a lot of "no landmines are evil" replies). Did you have a rebuttal for that argument?

Invade them?

Waterana - March 31, 2006 01:17 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Boring Internet Games @ Mar 31 2006, 09:13 PM)
Waterana: I honestly hadn't considered that. It's too late to change it now - I just hope I don't cop any flak for that (to be honest, early responses aren't promising anyway - a lot of "no landmines are evil" replies). Did you have a rebuttal for that argument?

Not really, no.

Just tried to avoid it when it came up. I'm not an ace debator so couldn't think of an arguement against that one, not to mention it was one of the last things I expected complaints about.


The Palentine - April 2, 2006 11:23 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Cobdenia @ Mar 31 2006, 01:04 PM)
QUOTE (Boring Internet Games @ Mar 31 2006, 11:13 AM)
Waterana: I honestly hadn't considered that. It's too late to change it now - I just hope I don't cop any flak for that (to be honest, early responses aren't promising anyway - a lot of "no landmines are evil" replies). Did you have a rebuttal for that argument?

Invade them?

HOOAH! Now thats an Idea I can go for!

"YEEEEAAAARRRGGGHHHH!!!!!!!"(just practicing my WAR CRY, see sig)




* Hosted for free by InvisionFree