View Full Version: Conservation of Endangered species.

The United Nations Old Guard > Proposal Discussion > Conservation of Endangered species.


Title: Conservation of Endangered species.


VL - April 3, 2008 10:49 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
Conservation of Endangered Species

A resolution to increase the quality of the world's environment, at the expense of industry.

Category : Environmental
Industry Affected : All Businesses
Proposed by : Venerable libertarians

Description : In these times of Population growth expanding into environmentally sensitive areas of the NS world, with natural habitats being encroached. With over fishing and hunting of game running unchecked, a side effect is the ever greater numbers of animals on the brink of extinction. It is with these concerns we enact the Conservation of Endangered Species Bill.

Article 1: The Executive

On ratification by the World Assembly, the WA shall set up an executive body to monitor NS world wildlife numbers. The Executive shall decide what numbers apply to each level of animal population and what Species receive the title "Endangered" and the protections the title affords. The Executive shall control funding and see it is used where it is most required.

Article 2: Quotas.

International best practise should be adopted in forming quotas and heavy penalties should be applied if these quotas are broken. Imposition of quotas should ensure that total bans on fisheries or game hunting of a specific species should be a rare event.

Article 3: Education.

National governments are charged with educating local populations in the benefits of conservation of species that are heavily hunted within their national boundaries.

Article 4: Species of National Importance.

Where there are species regarded with a sense of national importance, National governments may apply conservation orders on that species within its own national boundaries and impose national restrictions to hunting of that species. These restrictions shall only apply within the National boundary and are not applicable to neighbouring Nations unless an agreement has been set by the neighbouring countries.
National Governments may set penalties for breaches of these national conservation orders.

Article 5: Monitoring

The WA in conjunction with National and Regional Governments, Non Governmental Organisations and Environmental agencies shall constantly monitor closely wildlife numbers in their area of concern. These numbers shall be tallied yearly so they may show increases or decreases in the numbers of wildlife. If considerable decrease or a recurring trend of decrease in population is noted local conservation attempts shall be instituted at a national level aided by local populations and national agencies.

Article 6: Capture and Breeding

If local populations decrease to a worrying level then local Zoological and Marine specialists shall step in to capture and breed, in an attempt to reverse the decrease in numbers. Also, if larger populations of the same animal exist in another part of the NS world steps should be taken to introduce new blood lines to the endangered species.
Local Bans shall be instituted on hunting of the endangered animal until such time as it is deemed safe to do so. Quotas shall then be applied to the hunting of the recovering species.

Article 7: Full Escalation.

Where a Species of animal has come dangerously close to world extinction levels, The WA shall impose a Full escalation of Protection to the species. All hunting of the species shall be expressly forbidden. Full funding shall be granted for the escalation of steps to conserve the species and to rebuild its population to an acceptable level for the species to recover. Criminal charges shall be brought against any individual or group in contravention to this.


This is a rewrite of NSUN resolution #119 UNCoESB. As the original author of that bill i am looking to resubmit the bill with regard to applying changes forced by the move from UN to WA.

Some points to note is that the bill is not based nor does it rely on the existance of other resolutions to back it up. It also had very little reference to the old organisation and as such was quite easy to meld into a new Bill for the WA.

If you wish to read the original it can be found here... http://forums.jolt.co.uk/showpost.php?p=96...4&postcount=120
Also as a resubmission i would be interested in hearing anyones thoughts on the points of the bill and any suggestions to any changes that should be made.

The Palentine - April 4, 2008 03:02 PM (GMT)
I was for it before, and i'll be supporting it again, even though I'm a member of PETTA(People Eating Them Tasty Animals) :P

Douria - April 4, 2008 05:00 PM (GMT)
It's fairly weak, but I think that's what you were going for. It looks mostly ok to my standards though. Maybe drop "NS world" in the preamble, article 1, and article 6 and just say "world"?

VL - April 8, 2008 11:55 AM (GMT)
The major issues I had with this before was that I couldn't find a way to fit penalties and numbers into the bill. Many people commented on this and again are commenting on it making it appear weak. My solution of an executive was to allow each endangerment to be met on its own merits and meant i didn't need to beef up with figures as it is taken the executive would make any decisions when presented with numbers etc.

If there are any ways other than grammar you think this resolution can be improved please do comment.

Rubina - April 9, 2008 03:53 AM (GMT)
VL, I've got a draft of some comments... just haven't had time to make them coherent. Will try to carve out some time tomorrow or the next day.

In general, I like the single-reso concept for this and would second Quod's recommendation of setting up the general environmental committee with this resolution.




* Hosted for free by InvisionFree