NEWS
LieHunter:****Latest News****


***We have been contacted by Scamfraudalert, who tell us that they are not ASSOCIATED (their block capitals not ours) with Les Henderson in any way. However, they have yet to provided us with any evidence of such as of this moment.****

We are researching the phenonmenon of 'scam boards' on the web and have found that those running some boards may not be what they appear. This board is to collect information on those involved or a forum for those whom have been wrongly slighted on a board to give a response.

Although we started the site with the intention of finding further information on Les Henderson, if the above statement is true and he has nothing to do with Scamfraudalert, then we are happy to post evidence of such on this board, as our intention is not to villify the innocent. However, we remain to be convinced.

We are happy to publish evidence that refutes information on the scam sites, if it is genuine.

Please do not post here if you have been caught out on some scam or another as we will delete any posts that refute information but do not provide us with eveidence.

We will not perpetuate any information on scam sites as this is not our aim. We simply wish to put a spanner in the extortion racket being perpetrated on some genuine companies.

 

 Ontario Court Awards Danages, Defamed in Canada? Read this
Track this topic | Email this topic | Print this topic
LieHunter
Posted: Feb 28 2007, 01:12 AM


Administrator


Group: Admin
Posts: 12
Member No.: 1
Joined: 7-February 07
In the June 4, 2004 decision in Barrick Gold Corporation v. Lopehandia, [2004] O.J. No. 2329, the Ontario Court of Appeal ordered increased damages and issued a permanent injunction against a British Columbia resident responsible for "a systematic, extensive and vicious campaign" of Internet libel against Barrick. The decision demonstrates that, in appropriate cases, Canadian courts will issue injunctions prohibiting Internet defamation even though the responsible persons are outside the court's territorial jurisdiction.


The comment is most interest.....

"In the June 4, 2004 decision in Barrick Gold Corporation v. Lopehandia, [2004] O.J. No. 2329, the Ontario Court of Appeal ordered increased damages and issued a permanent injunction against a British Columbia resident responsible for "a systematic, extensive and vicious campaign" of Internet libel against Barrick. The decision demonstrates that, in appropriate cases, Canadian courts will issue injunctions prohibiting Internet defamation even though the responsible persons are outside the court's territorial jurisdiction."

Read it here
Top
« Next Oldest | Scamfraudalert Cases and Suits | Next Newest »


Topic Options



© .

Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 7/7/05) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.3313 seconds | Archive